allison! @aparrish@oulipo.social

lift up that asphalt and—look, what's this? that sandy coast!

judith light had history's most foofy bangs. that is all, good day oulipians

launching a chic bar? imo all @andsoon posts in which & occurs mid-word would work on your sign

what counts as a "no", you ask? all i can say is: I "no"s it as I looks at it

sapir-whorf cosmology

our constraint allows talk of nor satan's domain nor that cloudy arcadia. oulipo-socialists must inhabit only this instant, only this common and sublunary world

&: and, in and of its own intrinsic quality, and

sadly, of all art schools, I think only Op Art attracts cats https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcXXQ6GCUb8

plan: train cats to look studiously at rothkos, post pics on a blog

Snookums, I Did Lipograms To Our Kids

Guys Inhabit Mars, Girls Inhabit Our Morning Star, Oulipians Inhabit, I dunno, Nibiru?

All you had always had a thirst to know about Oulipo*

* But, owing to worry, you didn't ask

statistically dubious strings comply syntactically

ohhhhh I follow now. oulipian constraints bring about kinds of difficulty similar to what you run into in translation. you gotta think about what words actually signify, what a word is actually doing. but you can do oulipian constraints monolingually

flat flourishing flashbacks flag flagrantly

glum lush truths bunk tumultful @prawnwarp

of sigmund's 3 psychic apparati, only "id" conforms to our constraint. which says a lot about what occurs on this particular mastodon instantiation tbh

short cappuccino with an additional shot #starbouckslipo

apropos of nothing: wow, this world truly has so many distinct kinds of human linguistic conduct

"what a half-fortnight, huh?"
"citrus, it's monday"

writing stuff is hard :(

oulipo.social: if it conforms (to our constraint), it's flouting norms (of typical writing)