@ranjit Hmm, I'll look into it.

@rjl20 <3

@ranjit Splitting local toots from far-away toots looks a bit tricky, but I think I can do this post-lunch.

@rjl20 thank you!

@ranjit Minus words from DMs: https://oulipo.social/words-20180910.txt

(Naif coding: singular and plural forms both show up in list, stray punctuation on occasion, &c.)

@rjl20 this is so good, thanks!

@ranjit Happy to assist!

@ranjit Also happy to find this:

@rjl20 snail is in top 100
linguistics is in top 1000

@ranjit A good match with what I was anticipating!

@rjl20 @ranjit according to my scroll bar, roughly half this list is a hapax! i didn't think it was that many

@kit @rjl20 oulipo haps a lot of ax

@ranjit @kit @rjl20 ranjit

@ranjit @kit I just had a thought: that list didn't strip out words from bots. Should I strip out bots I know about and post again?

@rjl20 @ranjit i don't think so, also i'd hazard that bots don't account for a ton of that list's hapax words

@kit @rjl20 @ranjit ah, but Jimmy Jay probably has lots of hapax words, that guy has almost as much passion for non-words as any linguist has!

@ojahnn @rjl20 @ranjit that's a good point! i was only thinking of quasi & whit.

jimmy, i'm sorry i forgot you

@ojahnn @rjl20 @ranjit also, i think of our handful of bots as an important part of our community and i don't want to discount bot contributions to our discussions or our vocabulary

@kit @ojahnn @rjl20 @ranjit particularly as our communal habit is to pick up what our bots say if it's odd, or out of our ordinary vocabulary in any way!

@ojahnn @kit @ranjit For "bots" I'm including @whit_whal, @quasihaiku, @allvalidwords, and @a_day_in_dublin

Hapax with bots: 12167 / 22648

Hapax without bots: 11737 / 21759

Hapax with only bots: 1578 / 3056

@ojahnn @kit @ranjit Data:

https://oulipo.social/allwords-20180910.txt
https://oulipo.social/botwords-20180910.txt
https://oulipo.social/nobotwords-20180910.txt

@rjl20 @ojahnn @ranjit @whit_whal @quasihaiku @allvalidwords @a_day_in_dublin i didn't grasp at first how 12167 << 11737 + 1578 but now i do #dataviz

@kit @ojahnn @ranjit Yup! Initially baffling, but should work out according to that diagram. (Also a possibility: I'm not good at SQL.)

@kit @ojahnn @ranjit "Is that a hapax in your diagram, or can't you constrain your joy at my proximity?"

@rjl20 @kit I had thought of comparing, though I think of our bots as an important part of our community!

@ranjit @rjl20 jynx!

@rjl20 @ranjit "snail-taint" - not a hapax now

@starlit @ranjit A snail tain't no kind of ax, hap or not!

@rjl20 @ranjit

Very zipfy even with your instances unique...constraints

@rjl20 @ranjit this is amazing